Skip to content

/// OPERATION SPOTLIGHT – U.S. Supreme Court

OPERATION SPOTLIGHT
The United States Supreme Court

Prepared June 8, 2012

Message Themes:

  1. Facebook had no evidence, so they attacked the inventor
  2. Why should inventors put up with such wasteful, uncreative nonsense perpetrated by attorneys, and a legal profession that is out-of-control?
  3. If Facebook prevails, the Rules of Evidence in patent cases are thrown out the window;
  4. American property rights are threatened by this case;
  5. If Facebook prevails, American inventors should not bother filing for patents, since evidence shows Facebook used Leader’s published patent to further copy the technology;
  6. The importance of verb tense will degrade our courtrooms to nothing more than three-ring circuses; and
  7. Facebook’s misconduct in this case must come under serious discipline (more than wink, wink, nod, nod);
  8. The legal disciplinary system is broken; a majority of members of each state’s disciplinary committees should be laypeople since attorneys have effectively stopped reporting white collar misconduct among attorneys and judges;
  9. The Federal Circuit Opinion was timed suspiciously to coincide with the beginning of Facebook’s IPO roadshow; and
  10. Did Facebook use influence to get, the experienced Judge Farnan removed from Leader v. Facebook just months before trial? What other influence may have been used to prejudice Leader?;
  11. Did Facebook use the mock trial to manipulate the jury and courtroom procedures?;
  12. Ask the court to look into the questionable conduct of USPTO Director David Kappos in interfering with normal procedures without cause (other than to help Facebook; Read: big-money contributor influence peddling in a government agency?)
  13. Please forward additional phraseology that you use.

Subject Lines – Add your own words after “Subject” Otherwise, all our messages look the same.

Your Message – Make it yours, from the heart. Let the US Supreme Court personnel know that us advocates of American property rights are gravely concerned and will not rest until (1) Leader Technologies sees justice, and (2) the serious problems in our justice system that this case has exposed are fixed.

Use Your Telephone Too! – Members of the US Supreme Court and their staff pay attention to public opinion. Pick up the phone and verbally express your concern to these individuals and ask for their help and advocacy.

The Supreme Court of the United States of America
Online Writers For the Court

Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Telephone: 202-479-3000
TTY: 202-479-3472
(Available M-F 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. eastern)
Clerk’s Office: 202-479-3011
Visitor Information Line: 202-479-3030
http://www.supremecourt.gov/contact/contactus.aspx

COURT NAME EMAIL (click)
SCOTUSblog Tom Goldstein tgoldstein@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Kali Borkoski kborkoski@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Tejinder Singh tsingh@goldsteinrussell.com
SCOTUSblog Matthew Scarola mscarola@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Lyle Denniston ldenniston@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog John Elwood jelwood@velaw.com
SCOTUSblog Orin Kerr okerr@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Kevin Russell krussell@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Ronald Collins rklc@uw.edu
SCOTUSblog Cormac Early cearly@jd13.law.harvard.edu
SCOTUSblog Conor McEvily cmcevily@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Nabiha Syed nsyed@scotusblog.com
SCOTUSblog Kedar Bhatia kbhatia@scotusblog.com